NestedMap
N.B.
This README contains the docstrings and doctests from the code by means of extractly
and the following code examples are therefore verified with ExUnit doctests.
Dependency
{ :nested_map, ">= 0.1.0" }NestedMap provides tools to treat nested maps (that came as a surprise),
notably:
- accessing nested values with a list of keys
- flatting a nested map to a list of pairs of list of keys and values
- nested merging
## Complexity
When describing complexities we assume n total entries (length of flattened list) with
a maximum depth of k (maximum length of key list). We do not define a bound other than
O(n) for the number of elements of depth k and therefore define m = n*k
### Accessing
Is of complexity O(k) of course
#### Basic interface
iex(0)> fetch(%{}, :a) # not found
:error
iex(1)> fetch(%{b: 2}, :a, 42) # default
{:ok, 42}
iex(2)> fetch(%{a: 2}, :a, 42) # default
{:ok, 2}
iex(3)> fetch(%{a: 41}, :a) # found
{:ok, 41}
iex(4)> fetch!(%{a: 41}, :a)
41
iex(5)> fetch!(%{}, :a, 42)
42
iex(6)> try do
...(6)> fetch!(%{}, :a)
...(6)> rescue
...(6)> NestedMap.Error -> :caught
...(6)> end
:caught#### Applied to nests
iex(7)> map = %{
...(7)> a: 1,
...(7)> b: %{
...(7)> c: %{
...(7)> a: 100,
...(7)> b: 200
...(7)> },
...(7)> d: 40}}
...(7)> {fetch(map, [:b, :c]), fetch(map, [:b, :c, :b]), fetch!(map, [:b, :x], :not_found)}
{{:ok, %{a: 100, b: 200}}, {:ok, 200}, :not_found}### Flattening
The complexity is O(m)
iex(8)> flatten(%{}) # empty
[]
iex(9)> flatten(%{a: 1, b: 2}) # flat
[{[:a], 1}, {[:b], 2}]
iex(10)> map = %{
...(10)> a: 1,
...(10)> b: %{
...(10)> ["you", "can"] => %{
...(10)> "do" => "that",
...(10)> "if" => %{you: :want}
...(10)> },
...(10)> the_inevitable: 42},
...(10)> c: 2}
...(10)> flatten(map) # Be aware that this syntax puts the symbol key
...(10)> # `the_inevitable` before the other keys!
[{[:a], 1}, {[:b, :the_inevitable], 42}, {[:b, ["you", "can"], "do"], "that"}, {[:b, ["you", "can"], "if", :you], :want}, {[:c], 2}]#### Accessing flattened elements
iex(11)> flattened =
...(11)> [ {[:a, :a, :a, :a, :b], 1},
...(11)> {[:a, :a, :a, :b], 1},
...(11)> {[:a, :a, :b], 2},
...(11)> {[:a, :b], 3},
...(11)> {[:b], 4} ]
...(11)> find(flattened, [:a, :a, :b])
2### Deepening
The complexity = O(k) * O(n) * he complexity of Map.merge
iex(12)> flattened =
...(12)> [ {[:a, :a, :a, :a, :b], 1},
...(12)> {[:a, :a, :a, :b], 1},
...(12)> {[:a, :a, :b], 2},
...(12)> {[:a, :b], 3},
...(12)> {[:b], 4} ]
...(12)> deepen(flattened)
%{a: %{a: %{a: %{a: %{b: 1}, b: 1}, b: 2}, b: 3}, b: 4}#### One can pass a list that does not represent a flattened map
iex(13)> impossible =
...(13)> [ {[:a, :a, :a, :a, :b], 1},
...(13)> {[:a, :a, :b], 2},
...(13)> {[:a, :a, :b, :b], 3}, # %{a: %{a: %{b: value}}} value was not a map according
...(13)> # to the previous line
...(13)> {[:a, :b], 4},
...(13)> {[:b], 5} ]
...(13)> deepen(impossible) # the entry {[:a, :a, :b], 2} will simply be overwritten
%{a: %{a: %{a: %{a: %{b: 1}}, b: %{b: 3}}, b: 4}, b: 5}A consequence of this is that, while this assumption holds for all maps
deepen(flatten(map)) == mapthe symmetric assumption
flatten(deepen(list)) == list
does not, even if list is of the appropriate type, meaning that
deepen(list) returns a map.
iex(14)> tail =
...(14)> [ {[:a, :b, :c], 1},
...(14)> {[:a, :b], 3} ]
...(14)> deepen(tail)
%{a: %{b: 3}}### Merging
is now a trivial task as it can be done as follows
(1) flatten lhs and rhs into arrays
(2) make these arrays maps with the compound keys
(3) merge these maps
(4) make the resulting map a flattened array again
(5) deepen this into a map,voilà.
here is a short demonstration:
iex(15)> a = %{a: %{b: 1, c: 2}}
...(15)> b = %{a: %{b: 2, d: 3}}
...(15)> amap = a |> flatten() |> Enum.into(%{})
...(15)> bmap = b |> flatten() |> Enum.into(%{})
...(15)> Map.merge(amap, bmap) |> flatten() |> Enum.map(fn {[keys], value} -> {keys, value} end) |> deepen()
%{a: %{b: 2, c: 2, d: 3}}
of course this is implemented in a convenience function merge which has the same complexity of deepen, in our case
O(K) * O(S) * Complexity of Map.merge where K = max (k_of_a, k_of_b) && S = n_of_a + n_of_b
iex(16)> a = %{a: %{b: 1, c: %{d: 2}}, x: 100}
...(16)> b = %{a: %{b: 3, c: %{e: 4}}, y: 200}
...(16)> merge(a, b)
%{a: %{b: 3, c: %{d: 2, e: 4}}, x: 100, y: 200}Contributing
Pull Requests are happily accepted.
Please be aware of one caveat when correcting/improving README.md.
The README.md is generated by Extractly as mentioned above and therefore contributers shall not modify it directly, but
README.md.eex and the imported docs instead.
Author
Copyright © 2021 Robert Dober robert.dober@gmail.com
LICENSE
Same as Elixir, which is Apache License v2.0. Please refer to LICENSE for details.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0