Hayata
Hayata is an Erlang/OTP framework for building AI agents around a graph-based execution model. It uses OTP processes, supervision, monitoring, and message passing to coordinate agent execution, with explicit ownership of process state and durable recovery checkpoints.
Hayata is designed to be usable from Erlang and Elixir applications. Its graph-oriented model is inspired by agent orchestration frameworks such as LangGraph, while exposing an Erlang/OTP-native runtime rather than a feature-for-feature clone of another API.
Highlights
- Graph-based agent execution with a configurable decision policy.
- Sequential and parallel node execution.
- OTP supervision and process monitoring for agents, nodes, edges, reducers, and edge watchers.
- Asynchronous invocation APIs and result notifications.
- Invocation checkpoints and task-result persistence in Mnesia.
- Recovery of interrupted invocations, including parallel transitions.
- Conservative handling of uncertain tasks: a task marked as running without a durable result is not silently re-executed.
- Telemetry lifecycle events for agents, nodes, edges, and reducers.
Architecture
- Agent --- coordinates invocations, applies the decision policy, tracks invocation state, and initiates recovery.
- Node --- a supervised
gen_serverthat owns local execution state, coordinates outgoing edges, tracks executions, and monitors edges and reducers. - Edge --- an anonymous
gen_serverthat runs an edge task and reports its terminal result. - Edge watcher --- monitors the node and its edge. If the node terminates unexpectedly, the watcher terminates the edge so it does not remain orphaned.
- Reducer --- a temporary process that collects edge results for an execution and produces a consolidated outcome.
- Task store --- persists invocation checkpoints and task outcomes in Mnesia.
- Node supervisor --- supervises node processes and restarts them after abnormal termination.
Requirements
- Erlang/OTP 29.1.1 (target runtime)
- Rebar3
Build and test
rebar3 compile
rebar3 eunit
Quick start
The following example mirrors a basic graph-agent pattern: define a node, define control flow, start the agent's supervision tree, and invoke it. This example uses a mock node; it does not call an LLM.
%% hello_hayata.erl
-module(hello_hayata).
-export([run/0]).
run() ->
AgentId = hello_agent,
MockNode = fun(State) ->
Message = maps:get(input, State, <<"Hello">>),
#{
messages => [
#{role => ai, content => <<"Hello, world!">>},
#{role => user, content => Message}
]
}
end,
Nodes = #{mock_node => MockNode},
DecisionPolicy = fun(Context) ->
case maps:get(step, Context) of
0 ->
{next, mock_node, <<"Hello">>};
1 ->
{finish, maps:get(state, Context)}
end
end,
Config = #{
id => AgentId,
state => #{},
nodes => Nodes,
decision_policy => DecisionPolicy,
max_steps => 3,
execution_timeout => 5000
},
case hayata_sup:start_agent(Config) of
{ok, AgentSupPid} ->
try
run_agent(AgentSupPid)
after
hayata_sup:stop_agent(AgentSupPid)
end;
{error, Reason} ->
{error, {agent_start_failed, Reason}}
end.
run_agent(AgentSupPid) ->
case hayata_agent_sup:agent(AgentSupPid) of
{ok, AgentPid} ->
case hayata_agent:run(AgentPid, #{input => <<"Hello">>}, #{subscriber => self()}) of
{ok, InvocationId} ->
await_result(InvocationId, 100);
{error, Reason} ->
{error, Reason}
end;
{error, Reason} ->
{error, Reason}
end.
await_result(_InvocationId, 0) ->
{error, notification_timeout};
await_result(InvocationId, Attempts) ->
receive
{hayata_agent_result, InvocationId, {ok, Result}} ->
{ok, Result};
{hayata_agent_result, InvocationId, {error, Reason}} ->
{error, Reason}
after 100 ->
await_result(InvocationId, Attempts - 1)
end.
Save the module as hello_hayata.erl in a location included in your
Erlang code path, compile it, and call:
hello_hayata:run().
Conversational memory
Agents can optionally preserve conversation history between successive
invocations. Enable this behavior with conversation_memory => true
in the agent configuration:
Config = #{
id => support_agent,
state => #{messages => []},
nodes => Nodes,
decision_policy => DecisionPolicy,
conversation_memory => true
}.
When conversational memory is enabled, Hayata carries the messages
entry from the agent's current state into the next invocation. This lets
a node build each LLM request from the previous conversation instead of
starting with an empty message history every time.
For example, if a node appends each new user message to the messages
list, successive invocations can build a history like
[FirstMessage, SecondMessage]. The application is responsible for
appending messages in the format expected by its LLM provider and for
deciding which messages belong in the conversation.
The option defaults to false. With the default behavior, every
invocation starts from the configured initial state, so message history
from a previous invocation is not retained. When the option is enabled,
only the messages entry is carried over; other state fields are reset
to their configured initial values at the beginning of each invocation.
This feature preserves history in the lifetime of the running agent. It is not a vector or semantic memory system, and it does not by itself provide a durable conversation store or guarantee that conversation history survives an agent or VM restart.
Invocation API
Hayata supports asynchronous agent invocations with optional result notifications and event streaming.
Starting an invocation
Start an invocation without a subscriber:
{ok, InvocationId} = hayata_agent:run(AgentPid, Input).
The invocation runs asynchronously. Use hayata_agent:get_result/1
to retrieve the final outcome when it is available.
To receive a terminal result notification, provide a subscriber PID:
{ok, InvocationId} = hayata_agent:run(
AgentPid,
Input,
#{subscriber => self()}
).
The subscriber receives one of these messages:
{hayata_agent_result, InvocationId, {ok, Result}}
{hayata_agent_result, InvocationId, {error, Reason}}
InvocationId identifies the invocation. If the invocation is rejected
before it starts, run/3 returns an error instead of sending a terminal
result notification for that request.
Streaming events
Enable streaming by setting stream => true and providing a subscriber:
{ok, InvocationId} = hayata_agent:run(
AgentPid,
Input,
#{
subscriber => self(),
stream => true
}
).
The subscriber receives streaming events in this format:
{hayata_agent_event, InvocationId, Event}
Each Event is a map containing:
type— the event type.sequence— a monotonically increasing sequence number within the invocation.data— event-specific information.
The event types are:
| Event type | Meaning | Data |
|---|---|---|
invocation_started |
The invocation has started. | Invocation input. |
node_started |
A node execution has started. | node_id, execution_id. |
node_partial_result |
A node has emitted a partial result. | node_id, execution_id, edge_id, result. |
node_completed |
A node execution has completed. | node_id, execution_id. |
invocation_completed |
The invocation completed successfully. | result. |
invocation_failed |
The invocation failed. | reason. |
Sequence numbers start at 1 for each invocation. In parallel
transitions, lifecycle and partial-result events from different nodes
may interleave. Use node_id and execution_id to associate events
with their corresponding executions.
Streaming events do not replace the terminal result notification.
When streaming is enabled, the subscriber receives both
hayata_agent_event messages and the traditional
hayata_agent_result notification.
Emitting partial results from a node
Node functions receive a context map as their single argument. When
streaming is enabled, Hayata injects a hayata_streamer function into
that context.
The streamer accepts a map and emits a node_partial_result event:
Node = fun(Context) ->
Streamer = maps:get(hayata_streamer, Context),
ok = Streamer(#{chunk => first}),
ok = Streamer(#{chunk => second}),
#{answer => 42}
end.
A partial-result event has this shape:
#{
type => node_partial_result,
sequence => 3,
data => #{
node_id => answer_node,
execution_id => ExecutionId,
edge_id => node_result,
result => #{chunk => first}
}
}
The example sequence number is illustrative. Actual sequence numbers depend on the other events emitted during the invocation.
The streamer accepts maps only. Passing a non-map returns
{error, invalid_partial_result}. A partial result from an execution
that is no longer active is rejected rather than emitted as a valid
event.
Partial results are notifications; they do not independently modify the agent's shared state or replace the node's final result. The node must still return its final result map as usual.
The streamer synchronously submits the partial result to the agent. This allows the agent to publish the partial event before processing the node's terminal completion notification.
Streaming disabled
Streaming is disabled by default. Existing invocations can continue
to use run/2 or subscribe to terminal results without enabling
streaming.
When streaming is disabled, hayata_streamer is not injected into the
node context and no hayata_agent_event messages are emitted.
Run options
hayata_agent:run/3 accepts a map with these supported keys:
| Option | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
subscriber |
PID | undefined |
Process that receives terminal notifications and, when enabled, stream events. |
stream |
Boolean | false |
Enables invocation events and partial-result streaming. |
Streaming requires a subscriber. Unknown options, an invalid subscriber,
or an invalid stream value return an error.
Parallel node execution
A decision policy can schedule multiple nodes in parallel by returning
{next, NodeIds, Input}, where NodeIds is a non-empty list of
distinct node identifiers.
All branch nodes receive the same input and current shared agent state. Their returned maps are collected independently and do not directly modify the shared state.
When every branch completes successfully, the policy receives the
results through the parallel_results field in its context. Results are
a list of maps in the same order as the requested node identifiers,
regardless of completion order.
DecisionPolicy = fun(Context) ->
case maps:get(step, Context) of
0 ->
{next, [customer, orders], undefined};
2 ->
[Customer, Orders] = maps:get(parallel_results, Context),
{next, aggregate, #{
customer => Customer,
orders => Orders
}};
3 ->
{finish, maps:get(state, Context)}
end
end.
The parallel_results field is undefined before a parallel transition
completes. After all branches succeed, it contains their ordered result
maps and remains available to the policy that chooses the next
transition. When the policy schedules another node or parallel
transition, the previous results are cleared. A new invocation starts
with parallel_results set to undefined.
If a branch fails or the invocation times out, the transition fails and pending branches are cancelled; incomplete parallel results are not published as a successful transition result.
Durable checkpoints and recovery
Hayata uses Mnesia to persist invocation checkpoints and task outcomes. The task store uses disk-backed Mnesia tables and synchronous transactions; completed task results and invocation checkpoints are flushed to the Mnesia log after writes.
A checkpoint captures the information required to identify and resume an
invocation, including the invocation ID, current state and step, active
execution, parallel results, and terminal result/error fields. When an
agent starts and finds an unfinished invocation for its ID, it restores
that invocation and reports recovery_required rather than accepting a
new invocation on top of it.
Call hayata_agent:recover(AgentPid) to initiate recovery of the
restored invocation.
Recovery classifies each task using its durable record:
- Completed: reuse the persisted task result instead of executing that task again.
- Not started: schedule the task for execution during recovery.
- Uncertain: if a task record indicates that execution started but
no completed result exists, recovery returns
{error, task_execution_uncertain}rather than silently repeating the operation.
For parallel execution, Hayata can combine completed branch results with branches that have not started, execute only the missing branches, and persist the final invocation result. Results retain the configured node order.
Recovery guarantees and limitations
Recovery is designed to avoid silently repeating a task whose completion is uncertain. It does not provide exactly-once semantics for arbitrary external side effects. If a node may have called an external service before the VM stopped but its result was not durably saved, Hayata cannot know whether that side effect occurred. Applications should use idempotency keys, external deduplication, or other application-level safeguards where retry safety matters.
Durable recovery depends on preserving the configured Mnesia data directory across VM restarts. If that directory is removed or replaced, the persisted checkpoints are unavailable.
Reproducing VM restart scenarios
The repository includes VM_RECOVERY_TESTS.md,
a step-by-step manual verification guide with complete local commands
for:
- A completed task result surviving an abrupt VM shutdown.
- A task left running without a result being classified as uncertain after restart.
- A running invocation checkpoint being restored by a new agent process.
- A parallel invocation reusing a completed branch and executing a not-started branch after an abrupt VM shutdown.
These manual integration checks complement the EUnit suite; run both against the exact commit intended for release.
Execution lifecycle
- The node validates an execution request, edge tasks, and timeout.
- A reducer is started and activated when result consolidation is required.
- The node starts and monitors edge processes.
- Each edge runs its task and sends its result to the reducer and node.
- The reducer consolidates the edge results and reports the final result.
- The node updates execution status, notifies any configured recipient, and tracks process termination.
Logical edge IDs and execution IDs correlate messages. Stale notifications must not overwrite terminal execution state or trigger duplicate notifications.
Telemetry
Hayata uses Telemetry to expose lifecycle events from agents, nodes, edges, and reducers. Applications can attach handlers to collect metrics, trace execution activity, or integrate with monitoring systems.
| Component | Event | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | [hayata, agent, invocation, start] |
An invocation starts. |
| Agent | [hayata, agent, invocation, stop] |
An invocation completes or fails normally. |
| Agent | [hayata, agent, invocation, exception] |
An invocation encounters a caught policy exception. |
| Node | [hayata, node, execution, start] |
A node execution starts. |
| Node | [hayata, node, execution, stop] |
A node execution reaches a terminal state, such as completion or cancellation. |
| Node | [hayata, node, execution, exception] |
A node execution ends with a reducer recovery failure. |
| Edge | [hayata, edge, start] |
An edge task starts. |
| Edge | [hayata, edge, stop] |
An edge task ends without a caught task exception. |
| Edge | [hayata, edge, exception] |
An edge task raises a caught exception. |
| Reducer | [hayata, reducer, start] |
A reducer is activated. |
| Reducer | [hayata, reducer, stop] |
A reducer completes or times out. |
A stop event indicates a terminal outcome, not necessarily success.
Where present, use the status metadata to distinguish completed,
failed, cancelled, and timed-out executions.
Start events include system_time. Terminal events include duration,
calculated with erlang:monotonic_time/0. Both use Erlang native time
units; convert durations when exporting to systems that expect
milliseconds.
Common metadata includes agent_id, node_id, execution_id,
edge_id, status, and, for caught exceptions, class. Reducer events
may also include expected_edges, result_count, error_count, and
pending_edges. Available fields vary by event.
Hayata's telemetry metadata avoids including full results, exception reasons, or stacktraces. Applications should also review their own handlers and exporters to avoid exposing sensitive inputs, state, prompts, or outputs.
Attaching a handler
-module(my_hayata_telemetry).
-export([attach/0, detach/0, handle_event/4]).
-define(HANDLER_ID, {?MODULE, agent_invocations}).
attach() ->
telemetry:attach_many(
?HANDLER_ID,
[
[hayata, agent, invocation, start],
[hayata, agent, invocation, stop],
[hayata, agent, invocation, exception]
],
fun ?MODULE:handle_event/4,
#{}
).
detach() ->
telemetry:detach(?HANDLER_ID).
handle_event(Event, Measurements, Metadata, _Config) ->
logger:info(
"Hayata telemetry event",
#{
event => Event,
measurements => Measurements,
metadata => Metadata
}
).
Call my_hayata_telemetry:attach/0 during application startup and
my_hayata_telemetry:detach/0 when the handler is no longer needed.
Keep handlers lightweight; forward expensive processing to a dedicated
process or metrics backend.
Fault handling and process supervision
The edge watcher monitors the node independently. If the node dies, including through an untrappable kill, the watcher terminates the edge so it does not remain orphaned. Node processes are supervised and restarted after abnormal termination.
Edge tasks execute in linked worker processes, keeping the edge GenServer responsive while a task is running. If the edge terminates abnormally, its linked worker is terminated as well. However, terminating a process cannot undo external side effects that have already occurred.
If a task may have affected an external service before its result was durably saved, recovery reports task_execution_uncertain and does not automatically re-execute the task. Applications should use idempotency keys, external deduplication, or other application-level safeguards where retry safety matters.
Design principles
- Use OTP processes and monitoring for concurrency and failure detection.
- Keep process responsibilities and state ownership explicit.
- Treat logical IDs separately from process PIDs.
- Keep cancellation and recovery scoped to the affected execution.
- Persist task outcomes before treating them as completed.
- Reject uncertain execution states rather than silently repeating potentially non-idempotent work.
- Validate behavior incrementally with EUnit and explicit VM-restart checks.
LLM
Hayata's LLM integration is designed around a provider-neutral adapter contract. The shared contract defines the normalized request and response shapes, capability reporting, error codes, and optional streaming interface. Provider-specific API payloads and HTTP details stay inside each adapter.
The hayata_tool_loop coordinates model calls and tool execution independently of the provider: it validates normalized assistant responses, executes registered tools in order, adds tool results to the conversation history, and continues until the model returns a final response or the iteration limit is reached. Providers should return normalized tool calls; they should not execute Hayata tool handlers themselves.
Available adapters
- OpenAI — OpenAI Responses API adapter documentation. Supports normalized text generation, tool calling, and streaming.
Implementing another provider
Use the Adding an LLM provider guide as the implementation checklist. It covers the adapter contract, normalized errors, tool-call serialization, streaming guarantees, and the test coverage expected before a provider is listed here.
License
Apache-2.0. See LICENSE.md for details.